3. Vocabulary and word formation
The vocabulary is completely newly invented (a priori), but sensibly connected: related ideas share a root, and new ideas are formed by compounding.
All roots are in the dictionary.
Roots
In the lessons: Lesson 2: The first sentence
Roots begin and end with a consonant (e.g. nam). On their own they are not words; only an ending makes them pronounceable.
Syllable block: no root begins with a short-word syllable (list in chapter 6). Because the stress falls on the second-to-last syllable, a short word in front of a word would otherwise sound like a single longer word (mi name like one word “miname”). That leaves 33 syllables for the beginning of roots (75 minus 40 short words, minus vu- and “ji”).
Basic type: every root has exactly one basic type: action, quality, thing or quantity. An idea has exactly one root: “food” and “eating” are one idea (nama), and so are “language” and “speaking” (sena).
Basic type of formed words: a derived or compound word has the basic type of its idea, that is, of the part of speech of its basic form in the dictionary: noun = thing, verb = action, adjective = quality, quantity word = quantity. All other endings follow from this: namalime means “to be a cucumber” (cucumber is a noun), ravenare “to be a teacher”, vesagefa “reading” (to read is a verb). Hunger is a noun, so duraname means “to be a hunger”; “to be hungry” = bure duranama (to have hunger).
Sound shapes of roots
Length by rank: the most frequent ideas and those that form the most words have short roots of consonant + vowel + consonant, that is, two-syllable words (nima water, vese to see). Rarer ideas (level 3) have long roots of consonant + vowel + consonant + vowel + consonant, that is, three-syllable words (dorala elephant, sereme to exchange). About 400 short roots are possible; 278 are taken (15 of them number words). Because roots must be told apart, only about 25 to 55 free forms remain in each domain. This reserve is for very frequent ideas and for hub ideas from which many words are formed.
Distinctness: two roots that differ in only one sound are forbidden
- if they belong to the same domain (they come up in the same conversations), or
- if they have the same basic type and the difference is a close sound pair: b/v, p/b, t/d, k/g, f/v, m/n, l/r. Many speakers confuse these pairs (b/v in Spanish, l/r in Japanese).
That is why the former “tal” (big) was replaced by bir: “tal” and tol (clear) are both qualities in the same domain and differ only in the vowel.
For short words the sound-pair rule is only a guideline. They stand in fixed places in the sentence, and the position separates similar pairs: ka/ga (question at the start of the sentence or after a word, “with” before a noun), te/de (“than” after ro, “that” at the start of a clause). le/re are also distinct enough. For short words only this is strict: opposite pairs differ in the consonant.
Long roots: a long root never begins with a short root and never ends in a suffix (-ar, -ev, -ot, -is, -en). Otherwise long root + suffix would be the same as a compound: “nimal” + -ar- + -a would give nimalara, and that already means rain (nim water + lar to fall). For the same reason a new short root must not be the beginning of a long one.
Word length: a word has at most 5 syllables; for frequent words the aim is 4. If a word gets too long, there are three ways out: a root of its own for an idea that is part of many words (tree gera instead of “plant + big”, so that forest is nisagera instead of “nisabimabira”), a simpler formation (to bring = to hold + to come) or a phrase of two words. A word of 5 syllables takes no further building block. Ideas from which more words are formed therefore get a root of their own early: telephone gonela instead of “senalipota”, so that mobile phone gonelisa is possible.
Selection rules when inventing. They only concern the choice of new forms, not the grammar; older roots such as lah (five) remain valid.
- No j or h at the end: with the ending -i this would give “ji”, and h between two vowels is easily lost in fast speech.
- Not the same consonant twice (“nan”), so that the root stays clear.
- No form that is a well-known word with a different meaning in a widely spoken language or sounds vulgar.
- Three different consonants in long roots.
Endings show the part of speech
In the lessons: Lesson 2: The first sentence · Lesson 3: Qualities · Lesson 4: Being without “to be” · Lesson 12: Want, can, must
Each ending has exactly one job, whatever the root:
| Ending | Part of speech | Job |
|---|---|---|
| -a | noun | the idea as a thing |
| -e | verb | to do or be what the root names |
| -i | adjective | the quality |
| -o | adverb | the manner |
| -u | quantity word | the quantity (only on quantity roots) |
| Ending | Action (nam eat) | Quality (bir big) | Thing (dov house) | Quantity (kir three) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -a | nama food, eating | bira size | dova house | kira the three |
| -e | name to eat | bire to be big | dove to be a house | kire to be three |
| -i | nami to do with eating | biri big | dovi house-like | kiri third |
| -o | namo eating | biro in a big way | dovo like a house | kiro three times |
| -u | – | – | – | kiru three |
- -e on thing roots means “to be an X”: dova hi dove. = This is a house. It is the same rule as bire = to be big. A thing word never becomes an action (“to house”), because that would have to be learnt separately for every root (water + -e: to drink? to pour? to swim?).
- -i on thing roots means “like an X”. “Belonging to the house” or “made of stone” is said with noun + noun.
- -u exists only on quantity roots. A word like “namu” is not formed (just as vu- exists only where there is an opposite).
With -u the last free ending is taken. Future parts of speech have to be handled with short words.
Derivation elements
In the lessons: Lesson 3: Qualities · Lesson 11: Building words
Prefixes consist of consonant + vowel, suffixes of vowel + consonant. This way the syllable pattern is always kept.
| Building block | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| vu- | opposite (only where there is a clear opposite) | biri big → vubiri small |
| -ar- | person who does it | namara eater |
| -ev- | place for it | nameva dining room |
| -ot- | tool for it | namota cutlery |
| -is- | diminutive | dova house → dovisa little house |
| -en- | make it so or make it happen | lagi open → lagene to open |
Like the endings, each building block has exactly one job that applies to every basic type:
| Building block | Job | Action | Quality | Thing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -ar- | person belonging to X | who does it (namara eater) | who is so (powerful → ruler) | who deals with it (fish → fisher) |
| -ev- | place for X | where it is done (nameva dining room) | where it is so | where there is X (book → library) |
| -ot- | object for X | what it is done with (namota cutlery) | what makes it so (bright → lamp) | what X is used with (music → instrument) |
| -is- | smaller, weaker | do more weakly (to love → to like) | somewhat so (same → similar) | smaller (dovisa little house) |
| -en- | make X be or happen | cause (to see → to show vesene, to learn → to teach ravene) | make so (open → to open lagene, dead → to kill vuvelene) | turn into X (part → to divide nifene, picture → to paint bavene) |
-en- replaces the earlier formation with “make” as a separate part (“binelage” for to open) and saves a syllable. It is not the same as -ot-: lumota is the lamp (the object that makes light), lumene means to make bright.
There is no building block for “done” (participle). “The bought house” is said with a relative clause (dova je mi nide po); frequent states have a quality root of their own (open, broken, finished, known).
Compounds
In the lessons: Lesson 11: Building words
The head word comes first, the specifying word follows. The ending at the end of the word always shows the part of speech of the whole word.
Linking vowel: between two parts there is always -a-; only the last ending shows the part of speech. To read, from “see” + “write”, is vesagefe, hunger, from “want” + “eat”, is duranama, grey, from colour + stone, is nusaboti. A built-in idea keeps its own stem: university = school (raveva) + big → ravevabira. This way action and thing stay one idea, as with roots: senaduke to sing, senaduka singing, song. The linking vowel used to depend on the part of speech; that had to be known separately for every word.
- nama (food) + lim (green) → namalima = cucumber
- written separately: nama limi = “green food”; written together: a fixed term (like “glove”)
- In speech, a compound and a chain of nouns differ only in stress: nisagera (forest, ni-sa-ge-ra) versus nisa gera (“place of the tree”, ni-sa ge-ra). A fixed term should therefore never mean something completely different from its chain.
- Proper names are never compounded; they always stand as a separate word: rava Senatola (see chapter 4, noun + noun).
Example: the word family sen
In the lessons: Lesson 11: Building words
| Word | Meaning |
|---|---|
| sena | language, speaking |
| sene | to speak |
| seni | linguistic |
| senara | speaker |
| Senatola | “language-clear” = clear language, name of the language |